Read • Watch • Learn

When Emily Brontë published Wuthering Heights in 1847, few expected the novel to become one of the most discussed works in English literature. Nearly two centuries later, the 2026 film adaptation directed by Emerald Fennell has reignited debates about the story’s power, its interpretation, and which version, book or movie, connects better with audiences.

The Novel That Shocked Its Time

Set on the desolate Yorkshire moors, Wuthering Heights tells the tragic and obsessive story of Catherine Earnshaw and Heathcliff. Far from a conventional romance, the novel explores violence, revenge, social class, and generational trauma through a complex, layered narrative structure.

Brontë presents readers with morally ambiguous characters. Heathcliff is neither purely victim nor villain. Catherine’s declaration that her soul is bound to Heathcliff challenges Victorian ideas about love and marriage. The novel’s use of multiple narrators, including Lockwood and Nelly Dean, creates distance and complexity, forcing readers to question reliability and perspective.

For many readers, the book is demanding. Its structure is non linear, its language reflects the nineteenth century, and its emotional intensity can feel overwhelming. Yet it is precisely this depth and psychological richness that has secured its place in literary history. The novel continues to provoke strong responses from students, scholars, and general readers alike.

The 2026 Film Adaptation

The 2026 adaptation, directed and written by Emerald Fennell, stars Margot Robbie as Catherine and Jacob Elordi as Heathcliff. The film reimagines the classic story through a modern cinematic lens, placing strong emphasis on visual style and emotional intensity.

The reception has been mixed but widely discussed. Review aggregators show ratings in the mid range, reflecting divided critical opinion. Many critics praise the film’s striking cinematography, the chemistry between the lead actors, and its bold reinterpretation of the source material. Others argue that it simplifies or reshapes the darker psychological themes that define the novel.

Commercially, the film has performed strongly at the box office, surpassing significant revenue milestones early in its release. This indicates strong public interest, even among audiences who may not have previously engaged with the novel.

Key Differences Between Book and Film

One of the most noticeable differences is structural. The novel’s layered narration and generational storyline are largely streamlined in the film. The adaptation focuses heavily on Catherine and Heathcliff’s relationship, giving less attention to the second generation that plays a crucial role in the book’s resolution.

The tone also differs. Brontë’s novel is bleak, gothic, and often disturbing. The film, while intense, presents the relationship in a more visually romantic and emotionally direct way. Some viewers appreciate this accessibility, while readers of the novel argue that the adaptation softens the moral ambiguity and brutality that give the original its power.

Character portrayals have also sparked debate. Certain relationships are reinterpreted, and some events are re sequenced or altered for cinematic impact. These creative liberties have divided audiences between those who value fidelity to the text and those who appreciate artistic reinterpretation.

Readers Versus Viewers

So which is better?

Readers who admire literary complexity often favour the novel. They value its psychological depth, its exploration of class and revenge, and its refusal to offer easy moral conclusions. For them, the richness of Brontë’s language and narrative structure cannot be fully captured in a two hour film.

Viewers who prefer visual storytelling may favour the adaptation. The performances, atmosphere, and modern pacing create an immediate emotional experience. For some younger audiences, the film serves as an entry point into Brontë’s world, even inspiring them to pick up the novel for the first time.

Ultimately, the answer depends on expectation. If one seeks intricate character study and thematic depth, the novel remains unmatched. If one seeks a bold cinematic interpretation with strong performances and visual drama, the 2026 film offers a compelling experience.

Rather than replacing the novel, the film reopens conversation around it. In that sense, both versions contribute to the ongoing life of Wuthering Heights in popular culture.

Sources

• Rotten Tomatoes overview and critic scores for Wuthering Heights (2026)
• Forbes analysis of the film’s Rotten Tomatoes rating and early reception
• GamesRadar report on box office performance
• Courier Mail review discussing adaptation choices
• The Guardian commentary on character portrayal and adaptation debates
• Marie Claire and Cosmopolitan features on major differences between book and film
• SlashFilm analysis of narrative and structural change