Which One Are You? And Which One Might You Become?
Skeptical educators voice concerns about AI’s potential to undermine critical thinking, diminish human connection, and disrupt academic integrity. Stories of increased cheating and devalued learning abound. For instance, some English departments remain wary, particularly around writing instruction, seeing AI as a threat to authenticity and original engagement. Globally, public support for AI in lesson planning has declined from 62% to 49% reflecting persistent wariness among parents and educators alike. These concerns echo deeper issues such as faculty alienation, loss of control over curriculum, and erosion of professional identity.
Reflection: If this resonates with you, you value preserved educational values and close student-teacher dynamics.
Thought to aspire to: You could evolve toward a more open approach, recognizing AI’s possibilities not as a replacement, but as a complementary tool when used with thoughtful safeguards.
Many teachers quietly explore AI’s benefits without openly acknowledging it—often because of institutional bans or social stigma. This covert engagement allows them to harness AI for lesson prep or feedback while avoiding criticism. A growing number of faculty use AI tools like Claude for grading (some delegating up to 49% of grading related tasks), even amid ethical tensions about transparency and academic honesty.
Reflection: If you’re quietly using AI, you know its practical gains but might feel uncertain or worried about perception.
Thought to aspire to: Transition into more open, empowered use advocate for ethical guidelines and institutional support.
This approach transforms AI from a novelty into a finely tuned tool. Teachers with strong digital competence design prompts to personalize learning, generate creative tasks, or support diverse learners. Research consistently shows that positive attitudes toward AI correlate with higher AI literacy and readiness to integrate AI meaningfully. Educators in this category often function as Adopters or Collaborators, progressively integrating AI into lesson design and classroom dynamics.
Reflection: You view AI as a creative ally and enjoy crafting customized prompts.
Thought to aspire to: Move toward the “Innovator” role developing new pedagogical models alongside AI systems.
This pragmatic stance views AI as a shortcut for repetitive tasks worksheets, quizzes, or summaries. Many educators report using AI tools to save time some calculating up to six hours per week on planning and administrative duties. While this boosts efficiency, there’s a caution: overreliance can risk creativity, critical thinking, and meaningful engagement.
Reflection: You appreciate the convenience and time savings of AI tools.
Thought to aspire to: Use that time freed up to engage with students more meaningfully or to explore deeper AI enabled innovations.
These teachers insist on a pause before adopting AI, they demand discussion around ethics, fairness, bias, data privacy, and equitable access. UNESCO and educators globally emphasize the need for frameworks that ensure AI supplements, not replaces, educators so that inequities and biases aren’t reinforced. Studies further show that trust in AI grows when teachers have both AI literacy and institutional safeguards in place.
Reflection: You prioritize responsible implementation, aligned with broader values and equity.
Thought to aspire to: Advocate for professional development programs, policy frameworks, and teacher led AI initiatives such as the AFT’s $23 million AI training initiative.
You’re open minded yet discerning. You recognize AI could enhance teaching, but you don’t want to rush in without clarity, skills, or institutional support. Research shows that most educators are familiar with AI but barriers like insufficient training, resources, and infrastructure hinder effective adoption. Teachers across Europe and beyond echo cautious optimism, balancing potential with concern for critical thinking and equity.
Reflection: You stand on the threshold of innovation, ready to explore but mindful of pitfalls.
Thought to aspire to: Seek out AI literacy opportunities, join training platforms, pilot small AI driven projects, and align with ethical principles.
Summary Table: Where Do You Stand and Where Could You Go?
Current Type | Strengths | Growth Path |
---|---|---|
The Skeptic | Upholds human-centric education | Explore AI-supported teaching with safeguards |
The Secret User | Practical usage, discreet resourcefulness | Embrace transparency and ethical AI advocacy |
The Power Prompter | Highly inventive and tech savvy | Innovate AI integrated pedagogy |
The Copy-Paster | Efficient and task oriented | Redeploy saved time toward deeper learning |
The Ethical Warrior | Principled and mission driven | Lead policy and training initiatives |
The Curious but Cautious | Balanced, reflective, forward thinking | Gain AI skills, pilot responsibly, influence culture |
Which One Are You? And Which One Might You Become? The Skeptic — “It’s just hype… Nothing beats a real teacher.” Skeptical…
Read MoreToday marks the final day of the Jeewa Australian Education Roadshow 2025, happening at the Cinnamon Grand, Colombo from 12 PM to…
Read MoreFrom L to R - Mr.Kayen Akeel Marketing Consultant - Mogo Media Academy | Ms. Madonna Joy Head of Academy - Mogo…
Read MoreFrom Left to Right - Mr. Indrakumar Kishore Kumar -Consultant, APIIT | Mr. Gamindu Hemachandra- ChiefAcademic Officer, APIIT | Mr. Mahinda Galagedera-Chairman,…
Read MoreEmpowering the Sri Lankan Youth with Higher Education Options, Career Guidance and Job Opportunities. EDEX, Sri Lanka’s oldest, largest and premier Education…
Read More